As an Indiewriter, read ‘as a business owner’!, it is important that the investments we make will make us money. We can’t afford to waste our precious money on things that won’t work. It’s difficult though to put a price on things. Sometimes it’s easy, a sale is a sale and has a clear monetary value. But what about things like exposure? See my point?
Now I’m sure there are plenty of methematical formula’s to put a monetary price on that as well, but we’re writers, not mathematicians. So what we have to do is put a price on it ourselves. How much would I be willing to pay per view?
As I’ve written about before, I’ve tried an ad with Facebook ads, (see here if you forgot how that went) as and now have the result so of the Amazon Product page ad as well. (AMS). Time to do a comparison.
The results:

Other things to consider:
– biggest difference: Facebook is very vague about how they spend your budget. Amazon is very clear, and you only pay if people actually click on your ad, instead of having an impression.
– Facebook lets you create your own ad, add as much text as you like, and have whatever picture you like. Amazon automatically takes your cover, and you only have two to three lines of text you can add.
– Amazon allows you to use whatever keywords you like, Facebook is rather limited
– Facebook allows you to search on demographics, like countries or even cities, women, age groups etc. Amazon only uses keywords that people search for in their shop.
– Amazon registers and gives you a lot more info on your ad. Like it keeps track of sales etc. Though the Ad campaign site only said I sold 7 books directly through the ad, My overall sales went up considerably as did my KU borrows. So I have a feeling it didn’t link all sales to the campaign.
– The audience is different. People on Facebook aren’t neccesarily looking to buy, whereas most people browsing on Amazon are there to buy.
Conclusion:
For me I’ll stick with AMS for now. I like how it gives me the free play with keywords, I can have up to a thousand, and still only pay for the ones that actually work. Which in my book gives me more of a feeling I’m not taking a huge financial risk; After all, I’m not paying if my ad doesn’t attract the right people.
Another thing I really liked, especially as a newly published author (I still can’t help but giggle at that term) is that for the same amount of money spend on ads, with Amazon, I reached over 7000(!) people. Whereas with Facebook only 215.
The only major downside to AMS is that it took me (a sucky ad copy writer) a while to create compelling ad copy in such a few characters available. Whereas in Facebook, I could put up my whole blurb, as well as fancy photo’s if I’d wanted.
If you have all the budget in the world, I’d say attack them on all sides with ads. If not, then, depending on what you want, AMS is probably the better option.

